By the same token we underscore the publicdisgrace opaque nature of the forms of life existence with respect to existence itself. In the light of the above findings it is evident that social being gains an alleged autonomy with respect to natural group sex and that as such it reproduces itself within its own bounds. This illusion is evident from the point of view of the ethos of existence. Nonetheless, rooted on this illusory assumption (about the specific nature of social being) a completely non-illusory but in its proper way real social subjectivity started to evolve. It could be called subjectivity within the sphere of illusion — secondary subjectivity (vide considerations about reproduced nature). Here we have to do — from the point of view of existence — with a paradoxical phenomenon (vide our comments on paradoxes and anti-paradoxes of cognition): something unreal (formal being) creates something real — a secondary subjectivity existent within the bounds of formal space of the metasphere of existence.



