Jan 9, 2009
Welcome to amazing Public Disgrace Sex Blog. Enjoy this unique content!
Gallery 1
MORE THAN JUST A FREE PREVIEW - PUBLIC DISGRACE!
Man in turn attains the balance and end of protozoan organically has its ethos, is all immersed in it. Still, it would be absurd to draw the conclusion that the ethos of man is the same as the ethos of a protozoan. Our stance in ethosophy in no case leads to atrophy of thought and self-annihilation of bondage public thinking. We speak of the ethos of existence proper to a given being. The obviousness of existence decides about the place taken by a given being. What is the sex relation between the taking of a place through the obviousness of existence and awareness of the unity of being?
Dec 27, 2008
Gallery 4
The notion of I is drawn from the primary public sex disgrace obviousness: “I exist”. All other notions of “I” are part of life existence — psychological, biological, social, etc. These are illusory notions of “I”. The true notion of “I” is possible only in ethosophic elimination. While the illusory “I” was founded in illusory self-awareness, the real “I” is rooted in real self-awareness. The real “I” never speaks of itself as I, since it “knows” that it really exists , and therefore it does not have to support itself by speaking of own existence. The real I appears also as a link between various illusory Is — the Is imagined (and also lived). Where the amateur skin of illusory self-awareness of I cracked — there appears through the real I — though self-aware, yet not externalizing itself, as it needs no such externalizations to confirm its own existence. The real I knows that it is. For the logic of our public hardcore philosophical language the real I is that which it is not — as it cannot be shut within the categorial expressions of that language.
No Comments 
