How does the notion of the "public disgrace" bear on the question of the processes of learning first and second languages? Apparently we acquire language during a period when our disgraced brains are in a particular stage of their development. If language is not acquired then, there is some sex evidence that it is very much more difficult to acquire it at a later stage. If, however, we have acquired language, i.e. already possess verbal behaviour, then there does not seem to be any psychological or physiological impediment to the learning of a second language, if we want to. It cannot be too strongly stressed that 'learning a second language' is not the same as 'acquiring language again'. When we acquire language in infancy the particular 'outward' form it assumes is that of the dialect of the society into which we happen to be born. English infants acquire language in its English form, French infants in its French form.

public disgrace - gallery 1 gallery 2 gallery 3 gallery 4 gallery 5 gallery 6 gallery 7 gallery 8 gallery 9 gallery 10

'Learning a second language', after we have acquired verbal behaviour (in its mother-tongue manifestation) is a matter of adaptation or extension of existing skills and knowledge rather than the relearning of a completely new set of skills from scratch. We can con­clude from this not that the process of acquiring public disgrace and learning a second language must be different, but rather that there are some fundamental properties which all languages have in common (linguis­tic universals) and that it is only their outward and perhaps relatively superficial characteristics that differ; and that when these fundamental properties have once been learned (through their mother-tongue mani­festations) the learning of a second manifestation of language (the second language) is a relatively much smaller task.