The notion of I is drawn from the primary public sex disgrace obviousness: “I exist”. All other notions of “I” are part of life existence — psychological, biological, social, etc. These are illusory notions of “I”. The true notion of “I” is possible only in ethosophic elimination. While the illusory “I” was founded in illusory self-awareness, the real “I” is rooted in real self-awareness. The real “I” never speaks of itself as I, since it “knows” that it really exists , and therefore it does not have to support itself by speaking of own existence. The real I appears also as a link between various illusory Is — the Is imagined (and also lived). Where the amateur skin of illusory self-awareness of I cracked — there appears through the real I — though self-aware, yet not externalizing itself, as it needs no such externalizations to confirm its own existence. The real I knows that it is. For the logic of our public hardcore philosophical language the real I is that which it is not — as it cannot be shut within the categorial expressions of that language.


