We know no other disgrace sex nature. In any case the false philosophical assumption about the existence of nature independent of people has led to appearance of “specific” forms of social being defined as a counter-element of natural being. Yet this specific form becomes something absolutely illusory when we clearly consider the fact these forms of social being completely fill our entire klife existence — so that we are completely unable to define the degree of that “specifity”, since so far nothing has appered with respect to which such specificity could appear as public disgrace. One could say paradoxically that social being in exclusively specific. In this interpretation of the standard philosophical question, it is not a question of projecting forms of social being to cover all being. Wishing to avoid such misunderstandings we suggest in ethosophy to refrain from using the confusing category of “petite babe getting anal” as it gives rise to a supposition that in the space of human existence there is still another type of being.


